|
Conference
of State Population Commissions / Councils
|
|
|
| |
|
PROCEEDINGS
|
|
&
|
|
AN
OVERVIEW OF THE
|
|
DEMOGRAPHIC
SCENARIO IN INDIA
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
jk"Vªh;
tula[;k vk;ksx
|
|
National
Commission on Population
|
|
Yojana Bhawan,
Sansad Marg
|
|
New Delhi-110001
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
L to R : Smt.
Krishna Singh, Member Secretary (NCP), Shri Shatrughan Sinha,
Union Minister for Health & Family Welfare, Shri K.C. Pant,
Vice Chairman (NCP), and Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission,
Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Union Minister for HRD, and Dr. K.
Venkatasubramanian, Member (Health), Planning Commission.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Foreword |
|
| |
Proceedings of
the Conference |
|
| |
The demographic
scenario in India - an overview |
|
| |
Speeches by: |
|
| |
(a) |
Mrs. Krishna Singh,
Member Secretary, NCP |
(b) |
Dr. Asim Kumar
Dasgupta, Finance Minister, Vice Chairman, State Planning
Board & Vice Chairman, State Population Commission, West
Bengal |
(c) |
Shri S. Semmalai,
Minister for Health, Tamil Nadu |
(d) |
Shri P. Sankaran,
Minister for Health, Kerala |
(e) |
Shri Bala Bachchan,
Minister for Health & Family Welfare, Madhya Pradesh |
(f) |
Dr. Shakil Ahmed,
Minister for Medical Education & Family Welfare, Bihar |
(g) |
Dr. K. Siva Prasada
Rao, Minister for Health, Andhra Pradesh |
(h) |
Dr. Tangor Tapak,
Minister of State for Health & Family Welfare, Arunachal
Pradesh |
(i) |
Shri Digvijay
Khanvilkare, Minister for Public Health, Maharashtra |
(j) |
Shri R. S. Ranghang,
Minister of State for Health & Family Welfare, Assam |
(k) |
Thiru E. Valsaraj,
Minister for Health, Law, Labour & Port, Pondicherry |
(l) |
Shri Shatrughan
Sinha, Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare |
(m) |
Shri Murii Manohar
Joshi, Union Minister for HRD |
(n) |
Shri
K.C. Pant, Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission and Vice-Chairman,
NCP |
|
|
| |
Presentations
by: |
|
| |
(a) |
National
Commission on Population |
(b) |
Andaman
& Nicobar Islands |
(c) |
Punjab |
(d) |
Tamil
Nadu |
(e) |
Jharkhand |
(f) |
Madhya
Pradesh |
(g) |
Bihar |
(h) |
Andhra
Pradesh |
(i) |
Uttaranchal
|
(j) |
Uttar
Pradesh |
|
|
| |
List
of participants |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
India is passing
through a critical stage in its demographic transition from
a high fertility and mortality stage into a low fertility and
mortality situation. The experience elsewhere has shown that
the process of demographic stabilization in populous countries
like India may take many decades even after achieving the population
replacement level TFR 2.1. Though the census 2001 has shown
that on the average the country is entering the phase of declining
fertility, there is considerable diversity in the demographic
scenario prevailing in the country. While eight States and UTs
accounting for about 11% of the country's population have already
achieved the replacement level TFR 2.1, another 11 States constituting
about 44% of the population are likely to do so by the year
2010. In a few of the States in the second category there is
a necessity to implement the population stabilization programmes
more vigorously to avoid a situation of not achieving the TFR
level 2.1 by 2010. However, the main thrust of the population
stabilization programmes in the next two decades have to be
in the remaining 16 States and UTs which account for the remaining
45 per cent of the country's present population. These States
are not likely to reach the replacement level fertility for
varying periods beyond the year 2010. This group includes many
populous States having comparatively poor social and demographic
indicators and infrastructural and human resource gaps.
|
| |
|
Despite increased
allocations for family planning programme over the years, there
has been no noticeable increase in the couple protection rate
in the high growth States recently. The large increase in the
number of couples entering the reproductive age group every
year in these States more than neutralizes the impact of family
planning programmes on fertility. This has resulted in the level
of unmet needs for contraception remaining very high in these
States. The immediate task of fully meeting the unmet needs
for contraception emphasized in the National Population Policy
still remains to be tackled. Each State has to devise its own
area specific strategies for fulfilling this task. The experience
of other States have shown that successful population stabilization
programmes can be implemented within the democratic framework
and without any coercion whatsoever, even when some social and
economic factors remain unfavourable.
|
| |
|
The Conference
of State Population Commissions / Councils organized by the
NCP on 25th September, 2002 has given an occasion for exchange
of ideas and information and an opportunity to draw upon the
experience and models adopted by more successful States. The
NCP is bringing out this publication with the hope that it will
give an overall picture of the population problem facing the
country now and suggestions about the direction in which immediate
action has to be taken so that the national goal of moving towards
a stable population is facilitated.
|
| |
| |
|
| |
(Krishna Singh)
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
|